Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to exclusion of the excise duty element from the invoice price for determining the assessable value of waste and scrap of paper under Section 4(4)(d)(ii) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Analysis: The goods were accepted as excisable, and the dispute was confined to valuation. The legal position on Section 4(4)(d)(ii) had been settled by the Larger Bench and by the Supreme Court, which recognised that the duty element embedded in the sale price is to be excluded while arriving at assessable value. That principle was held applicable to waste and scrap sold by the assessee, and the plea was treated as a legal one capable of being raised at the stage of appeal.
Conclusion: The assessee was held entitled to abatement of the duty element from the invoice price for valuation purposes, and the original authority was directed to re-quantify the duty and grant refund of any excess amount paid.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded only on the valuation issue, while the remaining findings were left undisturbed, resulting in partial relief to the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: For valuation under Section 4(4)(d)(ii) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, the excise duty element embedded in the sale price must be excluded from the invoice price to arrive at assessable value.