Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicants had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in relation to anti-dumping duty on hard ring ferrite magnets and the penalties imposed.
Analysis: The imported goods were described as hard ring ferrite magnets, but the material on record indicated that they were unmagnetized and not magnets as such. The notification in force used the expression "Hard Ferrite Magnets", while the later notification expressly included "hard ring ferrite magnets including in unmagnetized form". On the face of the wording, the earlier notification did not clearly cover the disputed goods. The existence of a later notification, and whether it was merely clarificatory with retrospective effect, was left for final hearing. A prima facie case was also found against separate penalties on the proprietary concerns in the circumstances noted.
Conclusion: The applicants were entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery of the anti-dumping duty and penalties during pendency of the appeals.