Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible in respect of the quantity of inputs lost at the job worker's end during processing under the job-work arrangement.
Analysis: The inputs were sent for processing under Rule 57F(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 read with Notification No. 214/86-C.E. The Tribunal held that the loss occurring during processing at the job worker's premises was covered by the Modvat scheme and that the credit could not be denied merely because the entire quantity of inputs did not return in processed form. The reasoning was supported by earlier Tribunal decisions allowing credit on processing losses and wastage arising at the job worker's premises.
Conclusion: The loss at the job worker's end did not justify denial of Modvat credit, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.