Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a duty demand and penalty could be sustained merely on the basis of shortage of raw material, by presuming clandestine manufacture and removal of the finished goods without independent evidence.
Analysis: The only established was shortage of molasses, which was the raw material. There was no allegation or evidence of shortage of the finished product, no statement from any responsible functionary admitting clandestine removal, and no material showing that the shortfall in raw material had actually been converted into denatured ethyl alcohol and removed without payment of duty. In the absence of evidence, the inference drawn by the lower authorities that the raw material must have been used in clandestine manufacture and clearance was held to be arbitrary and subjective. At most, proceedings could be taken for the shortage of raw material as permissible in law, but duty could not be demanded on a hypothetical assumption of manufacture and removal.
Conclusion: The duty demand and penalty were not sustainable and were set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: A demand of central excise duty cannot rest solely on shortage of raw material without evidence of actual clandestine manufacture and removal of the finished goods.