Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the denial of personal hearing before revisional authorities vitiated the assessment proceedings. (ii) Whether credit notes issued by the manufacturers could be excluded from the taxable turnover of intermediate dealers, depending on the tax actually suffered at the preceding point of sale.
Issue (i): Whether the denial of personal hearing before revisional authorities vitiated the assessment proceedings.
Analysis: The objections of the assessees were considered, but no personal hearing was afforded. The absence of a hearing was held to be unsustainable in the circumstances, particularly where the assessees contended that relevant documents were not earlier produced because they had been seized by the tax authorities.
Conclusion: The denial of personal hearing was not justified.
Issue (ii): Whether credit notes issued by the manufacturers could be excluded from the taxable turnover of intermediate dealers, depending on the tax actually suffered at the preceding point of sale.
Analysis: The liability of an intermediate dealer depended on whether the selling dealer had already paid tax on the full sale price before adjustment of the credit notes. If tax had been levied at the preceding point on the higher amount, the credit notes could not be mechanically added to the purchaser's taxable turnover. The correct position had to be verified from books of account and supporting sale bills and memos, since the assessee had not earlier produced the complete records.
Conclusion: The matter required fresh verification by the Deputy Commissioner, and the tax consequence would depend on proof of the amount on which the selling dealer had actually paid tax.
Final Conclusion: The dispute was sent back for factual verification of the tax paid at the preceding point of sale, and the assessee was given an opportunity to produce the necessary records before the competent authority.
Ratio Decidendi: In determining the taxable turnover of an intermediate dealer, credit notes can affect liability only if the tax incidence at the immediately preceding point of sale is established on the relevant gross amount; the issue must be decided on verified records rather than assumption.