Commercial classification of aluminium scrap prevails over utensil entry; prior sales tax payment may exclude purchase tax.

Old aluminium vessels and aluminium scrap used to manufacture new utensils were treated as distinct from finished aluminium household utensils, so the goods fell under the specific metal scrap entry rather than the utensil entry. In interpreting fiscal classifications, the true commercial character of the goods controlled, and a specific entry could not be displaced by stretching the wider entry. The Court also stated that purchase tax is not leviable where sales tax has already been paid on the goods, but the factual question of prior payment had not been examined and was remitted for fresh consideration by the assessing authority.

---

---

Issues: Whether old aluminium vessels and aluminium scrap purchased for manufacture of new utensils were taxable under entry 83 of the First Schedule to the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 rather than entry 5, and whether purchase tax could be levied if sales tax had already been paid on the goods.

Analysis: The relevant schedule contained separate entries for aluminium household utensils, aluminium products, and metal scraps. The goods in question were found to be old aluminium vessels and scrap, not finished aluminium household utensils. The Court treated scrap as a distinct commodity from utensils and held that, where a specific entry covered metal scrap, the goods could not be brought under the utensil entry by stretching its language. The Court also accepted the legal position that if sales tax had already been paid on the goods, purchase tax would not be leviable, but the actual factual question whether such tax had in fact been paid had not been examined by the assessing authority and required fresh consideration.

Conclusion: The goods were correctly treated as falling under entry 83, and the High Court's view was upheld. The question whether purchase tax was excluded because sales tax had already been paid was left to be determined afresh by the assessing authority.

Final Conclusion: The appeal failed on the classification issue, while the factual question relating to prior payment of sales tax was remitted for reconsideration.

Ratio Decidendi: In interpreting fiscal entries, a commodity must be classified according to its true commercial character, and where a specific entry covers the goods, they cannot be forced into another entry by strained construction.

---