Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on lubricating oil, coolants, transformer oil and hydraulic oil used in machinery and systems for effective functioning of the manufacturing process.
Analysis: The credit was examined under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The items in question were treated as goods used indirectly in or in relation to the manufacture of the finished product, and not as capital goods under Rule 57Q. The reasoning also followed the Board circular clarifying that transformer oil functions as a coolant essential for transformer operation, and that similar treatment applies to hydraulic oil and other lubricants used for proper functioning of machinery.
Conclusion: Modvat credit on the disputed oil and coolant items was held admissible under Rule 57A and the Revenue's objection was rejected.
Final Conclusion: The departmental challenge failed, and the allowance of Modvat credit to the assessee was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Consumables such as lubricating oil, coolant, transformer oil and hydraulic oil are eligible for Modvat credit when they are used indirectly in or in relation to manufacture and are not confined to capital goods treatment.