Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether duty was payable when confiscated imported goods were redeemed under Section 125 of the Customs Act, 1962; and (ii) whether the redemption fine imposed was liable to be enhanced.
Issue (i): Whether duty was payable when confiscated imported goods were redeemed under Section 125 of the Customs Act, 1962.
Analysis: Section 125 of the Customs Act, 1962 contemplates payment of duty at the time the option for redemption of confiscated goods is exercised. The adjudicating authority had omitted this requirement while allowing redemption of the imported cars on payment of fine and penalty alone.
Conclusion: The omission was held to be legally infirm, and the Revenue succeeded on this issue.
Issue (ii): Whether the redemption fine imposed was liable to be enhanced.
Analysis: The claim for enhancement was not supported by evidence showing that the margin of profit had not been wiped out by market enquiry or other material on record. In the absence of supporting evidence, interference with the quantified redemption fine was not warranted.
Conclusion: The request for enhancement of redemption fine was rejected.
Final Conclusion: The order was interfered with only to the extent of holding that duty was payable on redemption of the confiscated goods, while the redemption fine was left undisturbed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where confiscated goods are allowed to be redeemed under Section 125 of the Customs Act, 1962, duty must be paid at the time of redemption, but enhancement of redemption fine requires evidentiary support showing that the existing fine is inadequate.