Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the criminal proceedings and cognizance taken for offences under the Penal Code and the Negotiable Instruments Act were liable to be quashed on the ground that the Reserve Bank of India Act barred such prosecution and that the Company Law Board's power under section 45QA displaced the criminal court's jurisdiction.
Analysis: The criminal court's cognizance was challenged under the inherent jurisdiction of the Court. The Reserve Bank of India Act was found not to contain any provision prohibiting continuation of criminal proceedings. Section 58E was treated as a bar only against taking cognizance of offences committed under that Act itself, and not as a general embargo on prosecutions under other enactments. The power of the Company Law Board under section 45QA was held not to curtail the authority of the criminal court to proceed with the prosecution.
Conclusion: The challenge to the continuance of the criminal proceedings was rejected and the request to quash the impugned order failed.