Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Court orders refund of excess sales tax on inter-State kendu leaf trade under Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947</h1> <h3>State of Orissa and another Versus KB. Saha and Sons Industries Pvt. Ltd. and others (and other appeals)</h3> State of Orissa and another Versus KB. Saha and Sons Industries Pvt. Ltd. and others (and other appeals) - [2007] 7 VST 214 (SC), 2007 (9) SCC 97 Issues Involved:1. Whether the purchase of kendu leaves by the petitioners constitutes inter-State trade or intra-State trade.2. Whether the levy and collection of sales tax under the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947, are unauthorized and without jurisdiction.3. Whether the excess amount collected under the guise of Orissa sales tax should be refunded to the petitioners.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Whether the purchase of kendu leaves by the petitioners constitutes inter-State trade or intra-State trade:The central issue revolves around the classification of the trade of kendu leaves as inter-State or intra-State. The petitioners argued that the sale/purchase of kendu leaves occasioned the movement of goods from Orissa to West Bengal, thus qualifying as inter-State trade under Section 3(a) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. They relied on precedents like *Commissioner of Sales Tax, U.P. v. Bakhtawar Lal Kailash Chand Arhti* and *Indian Explosives Limited v. State of Bihar* to support their claim that the transactions were inter-State sales.Conversely, the respondents, including the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and OFDC, contended that the contract did not necessitate the movement of goods from one State to another, and the sale did not occasion such movement, thus constituting intra-State trade. They cited cases like *Commissioner of Sales Tax, U.P. v. Suresh Chand Jain* and *Similipahar Forest Development Corporation Limited v. State of Orissa* to argue that the transactions were intra-State sales.The court examined the contractual obligations, the issuance of transport permits, and the movement of goods. It was noted that the sale of kendu leaves was completed only after the issuance of transport permits specifying the destination, indicating that the movement of goods was a necessary incident of the sale. Thus, the court concluded that the sale occasioned the movement of goods from Orissa to West Bengal, satisfying the conditions for inter-State trade under Section 3(a) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.2. Whether the levy and collection of sales tax under the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947, are unauthorized and without jurisdiction:Given the court's conclusion that the transactions were inter-State sales, the levy and collection of sales tax under the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947, were deemed unauthorized and without jurisdiction. The court emphasized that the transactions were exigible to Central sales tax under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, and not to local sales tax.3. Whether the excess amount collected under the guise of Orissa sales tax should be refunded to the petitioners:The court directed the opposite parties to refund the excess amount collected under the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947, to the petitioners within two months of receipt of the writ from the court. If the excess amount was not paid within the stipulated time, the petitioners would be entitled to receive interest at the rate of 16 percent per annum on the differential amount from the date of default.Conclusion:The court allowed the writ petitions, concluding that the transactions in question constituted inter-State sales, and thus, the levy and collection of sales tax under the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947, were unauthorized. The excess amount collected was ordered to be refunded to the petitioners.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found