Income-tax Tribunal's Recall Power Limited to Rectification under Section 254(2)

The Court held that the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal exceeded its authority in recalling its earlier order, emphasizing that the Tribunal's power is limited to rectification under section 254(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal's decision to recall the order was deemed impermissible as it did not fall within the scope of rectification for mistakes apparent on record. The Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, stating that the Tribunal lacks the general power of review unless explicitly granted by statute.

---

---

Issues:
Competency of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal to recall its earlier order based on mistakes pointed out in a miscellaneous application under section 254(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Analysis:
The case involved a question of law referred by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal regarding the competency to recall its earlier order. The respondent had disclosed jewellery worth Rs. 73,887 in her return, supported by a confirmation from her father. The Income-tax Officer added this amount as the source of investment was not explained under section 69A. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner reversed this decision, but the Tribunal reinstated the Income-tax Officer's finding. The respondent sought rectification, stating the addition was for Rs. 7,065, not Rs. 73,887. The Tribunal allowed the application and recalled its order.

The Revenue argued that the Tribunal reviewed its order, which is impermissible. The Tribunal's finding emphasized the respondent's obligation to explain the source of the jewellery, not solely relying on family customs. The Tribunal's order indicated that the onus was on the respondent to prove the source of investment. However, the Tribunal, in recalling its order, deviated from this finding. The Court cited precedents stating that the Tribunal lacks the power to review its orders unless explicitly granted by the statute. The Tribunal's authority is limited to rectification under section 254(2) of the Act.

The Court concluded that without a specific power of review, the Tribunal cannot exercise such authority. However, under section 254(2), rectification of mistakes apparent on record is permissible. As the Tribunal's decision to recall the order was not based on a mistake falling within section 254(2), the Court ruled in favor of the Revenue. The judgment clarified that while rectification is allowed for evident errors, general review powers are not conferred on the Tribunal.

---