Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 273(2)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was leviable for filing an untrue estimate of advance tax, and whether the tax paid during the financial year had to be taken into account if it was paid before the close of the financial year though after the due date.
Analysis: Penalty under section 273(2)(a) is attracted only when the assessee furnishes an estimate which he knew or had reason to believe to be untrue, but the quantum of penalty is governed by the shortfall between the tax actually paid during the relevant financial year and 75 per cent of the assessed tax, or the amount payable under a notice under section 210, whichever is less. On the facts, the tax paid by the assessee did not fall short of 75 per cent of the assessed tax, so the statutory basis for levying penalty was absent. For this computation, all advance tax payments made during the financial year, whether timely or delayed but made before the close of that year, were required to be included.
Conclusion: No penalty was leviable, and the cancellation of penalty was / upheld in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Penalty for an untrue advance-tax estimate cannot be sustained unless the statutory shortfall prescribed by section 273(2)(a) is established on the basis of all advance tax paid during the financial year.