Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on Ammonium Nitrate and Primex used outside the cement factory for manufacture of explosives consumed captively at the mines for mining limestone, notwithstanding exemption of the intermediate explosives under the relevant notification.
Analysis: The inputs were used in the manufacture of explosives at the mines, and those explosives were consumed at the same site for mining limestone that was later used in cement manufacture. Applying the Supreme Court's ratio that an input need not be brought into the factory of final production for Modvat eligibility, the inputs retained their character as eligible inputs. The exemption of the intermediate explosives did not by itself bar credit on the inputs, because Rule 57D protected credit where intermediate products emerged in the process and the denial under Rule 57C was not available on the facts found. The credit was, therefore, allowable for use against duty on the final product.
Conclusion: Modvat credit on Ammonium Nitrate and Primex was admissible, and the denial of credit was unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the assessee obtained consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: For Modvat purposes, inputs used in the manufacture of an intermediate product outside the factory remain eligible for credit if the intermediate product is captively consumed in the production chain, and exemption of the intermediate product does not by itself defeat credit on the inputs.