Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a diesel engine, treated as a part of a generating set used in the factory, was eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules despite the generating set as a whole not having been purchased.
Analysis: The finding that the diesel engine formed part of the generating set was not disputed. On that footing, the engine fell within the relevant clause of the Explanation to Rule 57Q. Denial of Modvat credit merely because the entire generating set was not bought together was unsustainable, since entitlement to credit for the whole necessarily includes its constituent part. The further enquiry directed on the integrality of the manufacturing process was unnecessary.
Conclusion: The diesel engine was eligible for Modvat credit and the assessee's entitlement was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a component is established to be part of eligible capital goods, Modvat credit cannot be denied merely because the complete equipment was not purchased in one unit.