Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether graphite blocks used in the furnace for manufacture of graphite electrodes were inputs used in or in relation to manufacture and therefore eligible for exemption under Notification No. 217/86.
Analysis: The graphite electrodes could not be manufactured without the furnace, and the furnace could not function without the graphite blocks used to conduct electricity. The blocks were embedded in the furnace and served as electrical conductors between the bus bars and the electrodes. On that basis, they were treated as integral to the manufacturing process and as parts of the furnace rather than as independent apparatus. The exclusion in the notification covered machines, machinery, plant, equipment, apparatus, tools or appliances used for processing or producing goods, but did not extend to parts thereof.
Conclusion: The graphite blocks were inputs used in or in relation to manufacture and were not excluded as apparatus, so the exemption was available to the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed and the exemption granted by the appellate authority was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a component is an embedded part of manufacturing machinery and is indispensable to the manufacture of the final product, it may qualify as an input used in or in relation to manufacture, and the exclusion for machinery does not automatically extend to its parts unless expressly stated.