Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether deductions allowed under section 80G of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could be treated as sums not includible in total income for the purpose of deduction under rule 4 of the Second Schedule to the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964 while computing capital employed.
Analysis: The question was held to be covered by an earlier decision of the Supreme Court which had already answered the same issue against the Revenue. That decision was treated as squarely applicable, and the court followed it. The court also noted that the Supreme Court had approved earlier High Court decisions, including decisions of this court on the same point.
Conclusion: The issue was answered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.