Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioners were entitled to exemption from personal appearance and to be represented through counsel under section 205 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Analysis: The petitioners were company officials residing outside Madras, their identity was not in dispute, and they had undertaken to appear whenever required. The discretion under section 205 was required to be exercised with regard to the circumstances of each case, the necessity for personal attendance, and the interests of justice. A rigid insistence on initial personal appearance was held to be unwarranted where no prejudice would be caused to the complainant and the accused could be effectively represented by counsel.
Conclusion: The petitioners were entitled to have their personal appearance dispensed with and to be represented through counsel.
Ratio Decidendi: Section 205 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 confers a discretionary power to dispense with personal attendance where the circumstances of the case and the interests of justice justify representation through counsel.