Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amending exemption notification issued under Rule 8(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was covered by the Central Duties of Excise (Retrospective Exemption) Act, 1986 and whether the refund claim was maintainable under that Act.
Analysis: The amendment notification was issued to give effect to the changeover to the new tariff structure and to correct unintended changes in duty rates arising after the new tariff became operative. The Act was intended to preserve the effective pre-existing duty structure by validating exemption notifications issued after 1 March 1986. Section 2(2) provided for refund of duties collected where the notifications covered by the Act had been in force at all material times, subject to the statutory exceptions where credit had been taken under Rule 56A or Rule 57A or where the goods had been exported under claim for rebate.
Conclusion: The amending notification was held to fall within the retrospective exemption scheme, and the assessee succeeded on merits, but the refund claim was directed to be examined subject to the conditions and exclusions under the Act.