Trade meaning and scrap classification governed sales tax treatment of compounded rubber and condemned goods.

Commercial understanding in trade may determine whether a product falls within a fiscal notification: compounded rubber was treated as a finished rubber product because uncontested trade evidence showed that meaning, and concessional treatment under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act was upheld. Articles sold as butyl rubber, banbury tailings, brass valves, empty drums and gunny bags were treated as scrap because the Tribunal found they had been condemned and sold as non-reusable goods, and that classification was sustained. The Revenue's challenge therefore failed, and the concurrent findings in favour of the dealer remained undisturbed.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether compounded rubber manufactured by the respondent was a finished rubber product entitled to the benefit of the concessional notification issued under section 10 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963; (ii) Whether the items sold as butyl rubber, banbury tailings, brass valves, empty drums and gunny bags were scrap liable to be assessed as such.

Issue (i): Whether compounded rubber manufactured by the respondent was a finished rubber product entitled to the benefit of the concessional notification issued under section 10 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963.

Analysis: The assessment turned on the meaning of "finished rubber products" in the notification granting reduced tax on purchase of rubber used by manufacturers of finished rubber products. Uncontested evidence from persons in the trade showed that compounded rubber was understood in that trade as a finished rubber product. The later notification was not treated as clarificatory or retrospective.

Conclusion: The respondent was entitled to the concessional treatment and the Revenue's challenge failed.

Issue (ii): Whether the items sold as butyl rubber, banbury tailings, brass valves, empty drums and gunny bags were scrap liable to be assessed as such.

Analysis: The Tribunal considered the nature of the articles and the manner of sale and found that they had been treated as condemned articles, not as reusable goods. The assessment was therefore made on the basis that they were scrap, and the High Court found no error in that approach.

Conclusion: The items were rightly treated as scrap and taxed accordingly.

Final Conclusion: The Revenue's appeals failed and the concurrent findings in favour of the respondent were left undisturbed.

Ratio Decidendi: Trade evidence as to commercial understanding may control classification for fiscal notification benefits, and goods treated and sold as condemned, non-reusable articles may be assessed as scrap.

---