Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit on imported inputs could be denied merely because the original triplicate copy of the Bill of Entry was unavailable, where a reconstructed certified triplicate copy was issued by Customs and receipt and duty-paid nature of the inputs were not in dispute.
Analysis: The prescribed duty-paying document for the relevant period was the triplicate copy of the Bill of Entry. The original copy had been lost, and the assessee first produced an attested photocopy and then obtained a reconstructed triplicate copy from the Customs authorities. The departmental authorities rejected the credit only on the ground that the original triplicate copy was not produced, although there was no dispute about duty payment, receipt of the inputs in the factory, or their use in manufacture. The Tribunal followed the Division Bench view that such circumstances amount to substantial compliance with the document requirement and that a reconstructed triplicate copy is acceptable for Modvat credit.
Conclusion: Modvat credit was admissible on the strength of the reconstructed triplicate copy of the Bill of Entry, and the denial of credit was unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the duty-paid nature of imported inputs and their receipt and use are undisputed, Modvat credit cannot be denied solely for absence of the original triplicate Bill of Entry if a reconstructed triplicate copy issued by Customs is produced and the requirement of the rule is substantially complied with.