Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in respect of the duty demand arising from clearance of cut sheets classified under a different tariff heading after processing.
Analysis: The order records that the inputs were received and duty-paid under one tariff sub-heading, and after cutting, the resulting sheets were cleared under a different sub-heading applicable to their reduced width. It was noted that the matter was prima facie covered by the Supreme Court decision relied upon by the appellant, and that the goods had been cleared under separate sub-headings.
Outcome: Waiver of pre-deposit was granted and recovery was stayed, with the appeal directed to be heard in due course.