Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether deemed Modvat credit on iron and steel re-rollable material was admissible to manufacturers who did not use the material for re-rolling but melted it in induction furnaces, and whether such credit could be disallowed when passed on by re-rollers who were themselves not entitled to it.
Analysis: The deemed credit scheme for ingots and re-rollable material of iron and steel was available only where the material was used in re-rolling without subjecting it to melting, in accordance with the Board's instructions. The facts showed that the first-stage re-rollers had taken deemed credit on material that was not used for re-rolling as required, and had passed on that ineligible credit to the appellants through GP 1s and endorsed documents. Since the appellants had no re-rolling facility and could use the material only by melting it, they did not satisfy the condition attached to admissibility of deemed credit. A transferee cannot acquire a better entitlement than that of the transferor, and ineligible credit passed on by one not entitled to it cannot become valid in the hands of the recipient.
Conclusion: The deemed Modvat credit was not admissible to the appellants, and the disallowance and penalty orders were upheld against them.