Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the winding up petition was maintainable before the High Court despite the contractual clause conferring exclusive jurisdiction on the Bombay courts, whether the limitation objection could defeat the petition, and whether the company had failed to pay its admitted debt so as to justify winding up.
Analysis: The Companies Act is a special statute, and jurisdiction for a winding up petition is governed by section 10 of the Act, which confers jurisdiction on the High Court within whose territorial jurisdiction the registered office of the company is situated. A contractual stipulation choosing another forum cannot override that statutory jurisdiction. The limitation objection had already been considered earlier and repelled, and that order had attained finality. On the merits, the respondent-company had admitted the principal outstanding amount, and despite statutory notice and opportunity, the admitted debt remained unpaid.
Conclusion: The jurisdiction objection failed, the limitation plea failed, and the company was held unable to pay its debts; winding up was therefore ordered in favour of the petitioner.
Ratio Decidendi: In a winding up petition, statutory jurisdiction under the Companies Act cannot be excluded by contract, and an admitted unpaid debt after statutory notice may justify winding up for inability to pay debts.