Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether imported application software for ATM and POS transactions was eligible for exemption as "computer software" under Notification No. 11/97-Cus. and whether countervailing duty was payable on such imports.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the scope of the notification's explanation defining "computer software". Software recorded on media and used for banking applications was examined against the exclusion of software required for the operation of a machine performing a specific function other than data processing and working in conjunction with an automatic data processing machine. The notification, as clarified by the departmental circular, did not extend to application software of the kind used for specialised banking functions. The software was found to be application software relating to banking operations and not software falling within the exempted class contemplated by the notification.
Conclusion: The imported software was not entitled to exemption under Notification No. 11/97-Cus.; the denial of the notification benefit was upheld, and the appeal failed on this issue.
Final Conclusion: The customs exemption claim was rejected, while the duty treatment of the software was sustained in accordance with the tariff and notification framework.
Ratio Decidendi: Software used for specialised machine-based banking applications and falling within the notification's exclusion clause is not "computer software" eligible for exemption under the notification.