Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a winding up petition can be maintained on the basis of an unascertained claim for interest when the principal amount has been paid during the proceedings.
Analysis: The petition was founded on an alleged liability to pay interest on the price of goods supplied on credit. There was no written agreement for interest, and the claimed interest had not been admitted by the respondent-company. The provisions relating to award of interest under the Sale of Goods Act, the Interest Act and the Code of Civil Procedure confer discretion on a civil court in appropriate proceedings for recovery of money; they do not establish a present, ascertained debt for the purpose of winding up. A winding up court cannot be used to adjudicate or create an unliquidated claim for interest, and a claim of this nature remains disputed and indefinite. Since winding up requires proof of a definite and ascertained debt and failure to pay it, an unascertained interest claim cannot by itself sustain a petition on the ground of commercial insolvency.
Conclusion: The claim for interest was unascertained and could not form the basis of a winding up order; the petition was not maintainable on that ground.
Final Conclusion: The company was not shown to be commercially insolvent on the basis of the alleged interest liability, and the winding up petition failed.
Ratio Decidendi: A winding up petition cannot succeed on the basis of an unascertained or disputed claim for interest, because winding up lies only where the debt is definite and ascertained and the respondent has failed to pay it.