Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 barred continuation of execution proceedings against an industrial company after a reference under section 15 had been made and enquiry under section 16 had led to preparation of a scheme under section 17.
Analysis: Once a reference had been made to the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction and the Board had proceeded under sections 16 and 17, section 22 came into operation and prohibited further proceedings for execution, distress or the like against the properties of the industrial company except with the consent of the Board. The execution case was still pending, and handing over the cheque to the decree-holder was part of the execution process. No consent of the Board had been obtained, so the executing court could not proceed further.
Conclusion: Section 22 was attracted, and the execution proceedings could not continue without consent of the Board; the objection of the judgment debtor succeeded.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the execution proceedings were directed to remain suspended in accordance with the statutory bar.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a reference under section 15 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 is pending and the Board has acted under sections 16 and 17, any execution or coercive recovery proceeding against the industrial company's property is prohibited unless the Board grants consent.