Section 11D recovery requires adjudicatory machinery before disputed duty collections can be enforced.

Section 11D of the Central Excise Act creates a liability to deposit amounts collected from buyers as representing duty, but disputed collections cannot be enforced unless the Act provides a proper adjudicatory and quantification machinery. The Tribunal contrasted Section 11D with Section 11A and noted that, in the absence of an independent mechanism then enabling determination of the dispute, demand-cum-show cause proceedings could not validly be sustained. The impugned proceedings were therefore without jurisdiction and liable to be set aside, and the recovery demands were quashed.

---

---

Issues: Whether proceedings to recover amounts collected as excise duty under Section 11D of the Central Excise Act, 1944 could be sustained in the absence of a specific machinery provision for adjudication and whether the impugned demand-cum-show cause notices were without jurisdiction.

Analysis: The Tribunal examined the scope of Section 11D of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and contrasted it with the recovery machinery contemplated by Section 11A of the same Act. It accepted the view that Section 11D creates a liability to deposit amounts collected from buyers as representing duty, but, where such collection is disputed, the Act did not then contain an independent machinery provision enabling adjudication of that dispute. The Tribunal followed the later decision of the Madras High Court in Eternit Everest Ltd. and the Tribunal's own subsequent decisions, and held that the absence of an adjudicatory machinery meant that the impugned proceedings could not validly be pursued under the existing provisions.

Conclusion: The impugned proceedings were without jurisdiction and liable to be set aside. The appeals succeeded and the demands were quashed.

Ratio Decidendi: A statutory liability under Section 11D, when disputed, cannot be enforced through recovery proceedings unless the Act provides a proper machinery for adjudication and quantification of that liability.

---