Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether waste, parings and scrap of flexible polyurethane foam in the nature of skins were entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 53/88-C.E. despite the department's objection based on Modvat credit and the duty status of the underlying foam blocks.
Analysis: The duty dispute related not to the foamed blocks themselves, but to the hard, unfoamed and partly foamed skins cut from those blocks. The blocks had been cleared without payment of duty under Notification No. 217/87-C.E., and were therefore treated as having suffered duty at nil rate. In those circumstances, the objection that the material had already enjoyed Modvat credit did not defeat the availability of the exemption claimed for the waste and scrap skins. Following the Tribunal's earlier view in the similar foam case, the exemption was held applicable.
Conclusion: The benefit of Notification No. 53/88-C.E. was held admissible to the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appeal succeeded with consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the relevant foam blocks were cleared under a nil-duty notification, waste, parings and scrap cut from such blocks could qualify for the exemption under the applicable notification, and a Modvat-credit objection relating to the raw material did not by itself defeat that exemption.