Carbide sludge treated as manufacturing waste, not excisable goods under the residuary tariff item.

Carbide sludge arising during acetylene gas manufacture was treated as waste generated in the manufacturing process, not as excisable goods capable of classification under the residuary tariff item. The tribunal relied on earlier tribunal and Supreme Court authority to hold that such sludge did not answer the description of goods liable to central excise duty under Item 68 of the erstwhile tariff. The result was that carbide sludge was not dutiable and the appeal failed.

---

---

Issues: Whether carbide sludge arising in the manufacture of acetylene gas was excisable goods liable to duty under the residuary tariff item.

Analysis: The material in question was treated as waste arising in the course of manufacture and not as goods capable of classification under the residuary item. The conclusion was supported by earlier tribunal and Supreme Court authority holding that such sludge is not excisable goods.

Conclusion: Carbide sludge was held not to be excisable goods and not classifiable under Item 68 of the erstwhile Central Excise Tariff. The appeal failed.

---