Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether slivers and rovings described as synthetic wastes were classifiable for levy of additional duty under Tariff Item 18(iv) of the Central Excise Tariff or under Tariff Item 68 of the Central Excise Tariff.
Analysis: The imported goods were synthetic wastes in the form of white mass fibre cut slivers and rovings with some mixed fibres. The Tribunal followed its earlier decision on identical goods, in which such goods were held classifiable under Tariff Item 68 and not under Tariff Item 18(iv). On that basis, the assessment to countervailing duty under Tariff Item 18(iv) could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The levy of additional duty under Tariff Item 18(iv) was not upheld and the appeal was rejected.