Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Sales Tax Officer could refuse blank declaration forms on the basis that the dealer's transactions were export sales, and whether such refusal was consistent with the mechanism for rebutting the statutory presumption under section 3-AAA.
Analysis: Section 3-AAA creates a presumption that certain sales are sales to the consumer, but it also permits the dealer to rebut that presumption to the satisfaction of the assessing authority by furnishing the prescribed declaration and other proof. Rule 12A(5) authorises issuance of blank forms only if the requisition is genuine and reasonable, but that limited scrutiny does not permit the Sales Tax Officer to decide in advance whether the presumption under section 3-AAA will ultimately be rebutted. The question whether the presumption stands rebutted arises only after the form is issued, filled up, and presented with supporting material before the assessing authority.
Conclusion: The refusal to issue blank forms on the ground that the transactions were by way of export of leather was improper and liable to be quashed. The authority could examine rebuttal of the presumption only at the assessment stage after the prescribed form and supporting evidence were produced.
Ratio Decidendi: A limited inquiry into whether a requisition for blank declaration forms is genuine and reasonable does not authorise the officer to pre-empt the statutory assessment of whether a rebuttable presumption has been displaced.