Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to total waiver of pre-deposit of duty in a dispute concerning valuation under section 4A, and whether the refusal of exemption under the standards and weights regime affected the appellant's plea against MRP-based assessment.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the lower authorities had treated telephone sets cleared to the Department of Telecommunication as assessable on the maximum retail price basis under section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant relied on the exemption framework under section 34 of the Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977, contending that the goods were specially packed for servicing an industry and therefore did not require MRP marking. The Revenue pointed out that exemption had been sought and declined by the competent authority. The Tribunal observed that the appellant's case was arguable and required detailed examination of the evidence, but at the interim stage it did not justify complete waiver of pre-deposit.
Conclusion: Total waiver was declined. The appellant was directed to deposit Rs. 50 lakhs and keep the existing bank guarantee alive, and waiver of the balance duty was granted subject to compliance.