Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether relief under section 633(2) of the Companies Act, 1956 could be granted to the petitioners for alleged non-compliance with section 113 of the Companies Act, 1956, and whether their conduct justified such relief.
Analysis: The petitioners were proceeded against for delay in compliance with the statutory requirement relating to transfer of shares. The material placed before the Court showed that the delay had occurred in the circumstances stated by the petitioners, and that they had acted honestly and reasonably. The Court accepted that section 633(2) empowered it to relieve officers from criminal liability where the circumstances so warranted.
Conclusion: Relief under section 633(2) was granted in favour of the petitioners, and they were relieved from criminal liability for any negligence, breach of trust, breach of duty, misfeasance, or default in relation to the alleged non-compliance with section 113.
Final Conclusion: The petition succeeded, and the petitioners obtained statutory relief from prosecution-related liability arising out of the alleged default.
Ratio Decidendi: Where officers of a company have acted honestly and reasonably in the circumstances, the Court may exercise its jurisdiction under section 633(2) of the Companies Act, 1956 to relieve them from criminal liability for alleged statutory defaults.