TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court rules cotton and hair beltings as cotton fabrics, not machinery parts. Appeal rejected, costs awarded.</h1> <h3>State of Tamil Nadu Versus Modern Mills Stores</h3> The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court's ruling that cotton and hair beltings are categorized as cotton fabrics under entry 4 of the Third Schedule, ... Whether cotton and hair beltings thus sold are cotton fabric falling under item 4 of the Third Schedule to the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 or whether they should be considered as parts or accessories of machinery falling under entry 81 of the First Schedule to the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959/ Held that:- Appeal dismissed. Simply because belts made out of cotton and hair beltings are used in machinery the belting does not become a part of the machinery or its accessory. The belting material consists of cotton fabric as defined in item 19 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. It cannot be equated with belts of different kinds used in different machines. Hence it is neither a part nor an accessory of a machine. It is correctly classified under entry 4 of the Third Schedule. The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision that cotton and hair beltings are classified as cotton fabrics under entry 4 of the Third Schedule, not as parts or accessories of machinery under entry 81 of the First Schedule. The appeal was dismissed with costs.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
