Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a newly set up small-scale industry using the brand name or trade mark of an existing industrial unit in respect of only part of its products is wholly disentitled to exemption from sales tax under rule 3(66a) of the Bengal Sales Tax Rules, 1941.
Analysis: The exemption under rule 3(66a) is available only to a newly set up small-scale industry that does not use the trade mark or brand name of any product of an existing industrial unit. A literal reading would deny exemption for all products even where the brand name is used only for a portion of the manufacture. Having regard to the object of the rule, the exclusion was confined to the goods on which the existing unit's trade mark or brand name is used. The manufacturer bears the burden of proving that particular goods do not use such brand name or trade mark.
Conclusion: The assessee was not entitled to exemption for the goods marketed under the existing industrial unit's brand name, but was entitled to exemption for the remaining goods not using that brand name.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the Tribunal's order was set aside, with the exemption restricted only to goods not carrying the existing unit's brand name.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an exemption provision excludes units using another's brand name or trade mark, the exclusion applies only to the goods on which such brand name or trade mark is actually used, and the assessee must prove non-use for the goods claimed to be exempt.