Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit could be retained when the assessee had entered the credit only in RG 23A Part-II without making the corresponding entry in Part-I and without proof of receipt and consumption of the goods in manufacture.
Analysis: The relevant scheme required maintenance of RG 23A Parts I and II under Rule 57G(7) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The omission in Part-I was not shown to be a mere oversight or clerical mistake. The assessee also failed to produce proof that the goods were actually received in the factory and consumed in the manufacture of final products. The earlier decisions relied upon were distinguishable because they involved substantive compliance and only a mistaken omission in the statutory register.
Conclusion: Modvat credit was not admissible, and the demand confirmed by the lower authorities was upheld.