Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on generating sets under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, despite the insertion of a later clause covering electric generating sets of output exceeding 75 KVA.
Analysis: Rule 57Q(1)(c), as introduced by Notification No. 4/94-C.E. dated 01.03.1994, expressly covered generating sets used in the factory of the manufacturer without any capacity restriction. Notification No. 11/95-C.E. dated 16.03.1995 inserted clause (d)(v), which dealt with electric generating sets exceeding 75 KVA, but it did not amend or curtail clause (c). The record referred only to a generating set, and there was no clear finding that it was an electric generating set. The later insertion therefore could not be read as taking away the pre-existing eligibility under clause (c). Notification No. 14/96-C.E. (N.T.) dated 23.07.1996 also indicated that no restriction was intended to operate against generating sets under the earlier clause.
Conclusion: Modvat credit on the generating set was admissible, and denial of credit on the ground of 35 KVA capacity was unjustified. The departmental appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: A later, more specific entry inserted into an eligibility provision does not restrict an existing unqualified entry unless the earlier entry is expressly amended or withdrawn.