Modvat credit for aluminium profiles denied where their use as capital goods in a humidification plant was not proved.

Aluminium extruded profiles claimed for use in a humidification plant were not shown to satisfy the requirements for capital goods under the Modvat scheme. The record did not satisfactorily establish how the items were used in the plant, and they appeared to be construction materials rather than eligible capital goods. As the assessee failed to answer the specific query on their use, the claim for Modvat credit was rejected and the denial of credit was upheld.

---

---

Issues: Whether Aluminium Extruded Profiles used in the humidification plant qualified as capital goods for availing Modvat credit under Rule 57Q.

Analysis: The claim for credit depended on showing that the items were used as capital goods in the humidification plant and were eligible under the governing Modvat scheme. The record did not satisfactorily explain the manner of use of the Aluminium Extruded Profiles, and the materials appeared to be construction items rather than eligible capital goods. The appellant also did not answer the specific query regarding their use for the humidification plant.

Conclusion: The items were not proved to be eligible capital goods for Modvat credit, and the denial of credit was upheld against the assessee.

---