Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether building tax paid under the Kerala Building Tax Act, 1975, is allowable as business expenditure under section 30(b) or section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The amount was paid on completion of construction and was a charge on the building itself. It was not a recurring liability like municipal tax, but a one-time levy connected with the acquisition and perfection of title to the capital asset. Section 30(b) specifically allows municipal taxes and similar recurring outgoings, while the statutory scheme does not extend that deduction to building tax. The expenditure was therefore treated as capital in nature and not as revenue expenditure. The residuary provision in section 37(1) was also held inapplicable because that provision permits only revenue expenditure and cannot be used to claim a deduction for an item specifically outside section 30 and of capital character.
Conclusion: The question was answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue; building tax paid under the Kerala Building Tax Act, 1975, is not allowable as business expenditure under section 30(b) or section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Ratio Decidendi: A one-time statutory levy on construction that is incurred to perfect title to a capital asset is capital expenditure and is not deductible either under the specific deduction for recurring taxes or under the residuary provision for revenue expenditure.