TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appellate tribunal reduces penalty, overturns currency confiscation in gold smuggling case.</h1> <h3>DATTAJI DEOKAR Versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, BHUBANESWAR-I</h3> DATTAJI DEOKAR Versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, BHUBANESWAR-I - 2002 (147) E.L.T. 390 (Tri. - Kolkata) Issues:1. Seizure of gold biscuits and Indian currency during search operation2. Confiscation of gold biscuits and imposition of personal penalties3. Legal possession of gold biscuits and currency4. Evidence presented by the appellant to support legal acquisition5. Rejection of evidence by the adjudicating authority6. Confiscation of Indian currency as sale proceeds of smuggled gold7. Imposition and reduction of personal penaltyAnalysis:Issue 1: Seizure of gold biscuits and Indian currency during search operationThe Customs Officers conducted a search operation at the business and residential premises of the appellant, resulting in the recovery of gold biscuits of foreign origin and Indian currency. Other individuals present during the search were also found in possession of Indian currency, suspected to be proceeds from the sale of smuggled gold.Issue 2: Confiscation of gold biscuits and imposition of personal penaltiesThe Commissioner of Customs ordered the confiscation of the seized gold biscuits and Indian currency, along with imposing personal penalties on the individuals involved. The order detailed the quantity and value of the confiscated items, as well as the amounts of personal penalties imposed.Issue 3: Legal possession of gold biscuits and currencyThe Customs Officers seized the items based on the belief that the gold biscuits were smuggled and the currency was derived from the sale of smuggled gold. The appellant and other individuals were issued show cause notices for confiscation and penalties.Issue 4: Evidence presented by the appellant to support legal acquisitionThe appellant claimed to have purchased six gold biscuits from a specific corporation and provided documentary evidence, including a sale register and demand draft. However, discrepancies in initial statements and subsequent disclosures raised doubts regarding the legal possession of the gold biscuits.Issue 5: Rejection of evidence by the adjudicating authorityThe adjudicating authority rejected the appellant's evidence, citing lack of invoices or receipts for the gold biscuits. The authority also noted discrepancies in the description of the gold in the sale register compared to the seized items.Issue 6: Confiscation of Indian currency as sale proceeds of smuggled goldThe appellant stated that the confiscated Indian currency was from the sale of gold and silver jewelry. However, the lack of conclusive evidence linking the currency to smuggled gold led to the setting aside of the confiscation and the order for its release.Issue 7: Imposition and reduction of personal penaltyThe appellate tribunal partially allowed the appeal, reducing the personal penalty imposed on the appellant. The penalty amount was decreased from Rs. 50,000 to Rs. 25,000, considering the findings and decisions on the confiscation of items and currency.This comprehensive analysis of the judgment addresses the various legal issues, evidence presented, decisions made by the authorities, and the final outcome of the appeal.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
