Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported bran cutting machine was entitled to the benefit of the exemption notification as machinery used for production of a commodity.
Analysis: The notification granted relief to machinery used in the production of a commodity, and the disputed machine was classified under the relevant tariff sub-heading. The appellants showed that the machine was used in their manufacturing process to convert coarse bran into fine bran, which was sold as cattle feed and on which sales tax was paid. The distinction drawn by the lower authority between manufacture and production was rejected, since production is wide enough to include manufacture. The reasoning that coarse bran and fine bran were not different commodities was also not accepted, because the fine bran was treated in commerce as a marketable product arising from the machine's operation.
Conclusion: The machine was held to be used in the production of a commodity and the exemption benefit was admissible to the assessee.