Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondent-company was liable to be wound up for inability to pay its debts under the Companies Act, 1956.
Analysis: The petitioning creditor established supply of goods and the debt due therefrom. Statutory notice under section 434(1)(a) was served at the registered office and returned with the endorsement "refused", giving rise to a presumption of service. No appearance was entered to dispute the claim, and the material on record remained unrebutted. On these facts, the Court found that the debt was lawfully due and that the company had failed to discharge its liability, showing inability to pay its debts.
Conclusion: The winding up petition was maintainable and was allowed. The respondent-company was ordered to be wound up and the official liquidator was appointed to take charge of its assets, properties and records.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a company fails to pay an admitted or unrebutted debt after statutory notice, and service of the notice is evidenced by refusal, the company may be ordered to be wound up for inability to pay its debts.