Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether capital goods credit under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was admissible on electrical items such as APFC relay, panels, control panels, enamelled winding wire and allied equipment used in the manufacturing process.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that a Larger Bench had already extended the benefit of capital goods credit to similar electrical items which supply electricity to machines used in manufacture, and that the same view had been followed in subsequent Larger Bench authority. Applying that ratio, the items in dispute were treated as eligible capital goods for credit purposes.
Conclusion: Capital goods credit was rightly allowed on the disputed items, and the Revenue's appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Electrical items having a direct functional nexus with machinery used in manufacture qualify for capital goods credit under Rule 57Q when precedent has recognized their eligibility as components or accessories serving the manufacturing process.