Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the company petition for winding up of an unregistered partnership firm was barred by limitation and maintainable under section 583(4) of the Companies Act, 1956.
Analysis: The petition was filed more than three years after the firm stood dissolved on the death of a partner. Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 applies to petitions under special statutes filed in civil courts, and the right to apply accrued when dissolution occurred. The contention that continuing liability to account for post-dissolution profits kept the winding-up petition alive was rejected, since such accounting relief arises only within winding-up proceedings and does not furnish a fresh cause of action for invoking clauses (b) or (c) of section 583(4). The court also held that where the firm is already dissolved, the proper ground is clause (a), not clauses (b) or (c).
Conclusion: The petition was barred by limitation and not maintainable on the grounds urged; it was held against the petitioner.
Ratio Decidendi: Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 governs a petition for winding up under the Companies Act, and the period begins when the right to apply first accrues on dissolution of the firm.