Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether provisional assessments under rule 21(9) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Rules survived the deletion of section 18 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, and whether the validity of such assessments was vitiated.
Analysis: The challenge was confined to sub-rule (9) of rule 21. The Court agreed with the High Court that the rule continued to operate notwithstanding the deletion of section 18, which had originally provided the statutory scheme for provisional assessments. The Court also noted that the point was essentially procedural and that the position had been followed in the State for several years, giving no reason to disturb it.
Conclusion: The challenge to the provisional assessment procedure failed, and the validity of rule 21(9) was upheld against the petitioner.