Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondents were liable to pay central sales tax at a rate exceeding one per cent in view of the State Government notification issued under section 8(5) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.
Analysis: The notification issued under section 8(5) and section 8 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 were treated as clear and sufficient to support the rate applied by the High Court. The question relating to section 8(2A) was not decided in this appeal, as it was left for consideration in other pending matters.
Conclusion: The tax liability could not exceed one per cent under the notification, and the appeal was without merit.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a valid notification under section 8(5) governs the rate of tax, the assessed tax cannot exceed the rate fixed by that notification.