Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, after sanction of a scheme of amalgamation, a fresh notice to the Central Government is required at the stage of dissolution of the transferor company without winding up, and whether an order for such dissolution can be passed on the official liquidator's report.
Analysis: The statutory scheme under section 394A of the Companies Act, 1956 contemplates notice to the Central Government at the stage when the compromise, arrangement or scheme of amalgamation is placed before the court for sanction. The subsequent prayer for dissolution without winding up is only a follow-up to the sanctioned scheme and does not call for a second notice. The only substantive safeguard is the second proviso to section 394(1), which prohibits dissolution unless the official liquidator reports that the affairs of the company have not been conducted in a manner prejudicial to the interests of its members or to public interest. In the present matter, the official liquidator's report, based on the chartered accountant's report, disclosed no impediment.
Conclusion: No fresh notice to the Central Government was required at the dissolution stage, and the prayer for dissolution without winding up was fit to be granted.