Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the benefit of Notification No. 341/76-Cus. dated 07.04.1976 was available to goods described as both sides coated multi-layered pasted art board.
Analysis: The imported goods were found on record to be multi-layered paste coated art board, and the test report confirmed that they were multi-layered coated paste board. The notification granted partial exemption to multi-layered board, and the benefit could not be denied merely because the goods were coated on both sides. The objection that the goods were art board was also rejected, since the Tribunal had earlier held that art board is characteristically coated on both sides and that coating on both sides does not exclude paste board or multi-layered board from the scope of the notification. The issue was treated as covered by the earlier Tribunal decision, and no contrary decision of the Supreme Court was shown.
Conclusion: The benefit of the notification was available, and the Revenue's appeals were rejected.