Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the goods described as slides and shells were liable to be classified so as to attract central excise duty, and whether the assessee was entitled to exemption under the relevant notifications.
Analysis: The goods in question were considered in the light of earlier Tribunal and High Court rulings holding that slides and outer shells used for cigarette packets could not be subjected to duty in a manner that duplicated the levy already suffered by the cigarettes contained in them. Following the binding ratio of those decisions, the Tribunal accepted the assessee's contention that the matter stood covered in its favour. The departmental stand was also treated as covered against it by the cited precedent.
Conclusion: The appeal was allowed and the assessee succeeded on the issue of duty liability and exemption.