Inter-State trade and commerce: whether sales qualify as interState hinges on contractlinked movement and onus on revenue to disprove local sales.

InterState trade and commerce requires both a sale of goods and transportation of those goods from one State to another occasioned by the contract between seller and purchaser; absent both elements there is no interState sale. The revenue bears the onus to disprove an assessee's claim of local sales and must produce material contradicting the assessee's affidavit and evidence. Where a tribunal accepts the assessee's consistent claim of local sales and finds no proof that goods were booked or transported out of the State in pursuance of the contract, appellate interference is not warranted and the higher forum upheld the finding against the revenue.

---

---

Issues:
Interpretation of inter-State sales of tendu leaves under U.P. Sales Tax Act. Assessment of tax on inter-State sales. Application for leave to appeal under article 136 of the Constitution.

Analysis:

The case involved an application for leave to appeal under article 136 of the Constitution against the judgment and order of the High Court of Allahabad regarding the assessment of tax on inter-State sales of tendu leaves under the U.P. Sales Tax Act. The respondent contended that all sales of tendu leaves were conducted within Uttar Pradesh and not inter-State. The Tribunal, after thorough discussion of facts, found that the respondent had been assessed for inter-State sales, which the respondent disputed. The Tribunal considered evidence such as T.P. form IV issued by the Forest Department, but clarified that the mere issuance of this form does not establish inter-State sales. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of both a sale of goods and their transport across state borders for a sale to qualify as inter-State trade, as per established legal principles.

The Tribunal found that the respondent consistently maintained that only local sales were conducted, supported by an affidavit stating no inter-State sales were made. The Tribunal noted the absence of evidence contradicting the respondent's claims. Consequently, the Tribunal rejected the department's contentions, prompting the Revenue to appeal to the High Court. The High Court focused on determining whether the sales in question qualified as inter-State sales. After analyzing the Tribunal's findings, the High Court concluded that the goods had moved out of Uttar Pradesh based on sale agreements. The presence of T.P. form IV was considered but not deemed conclusive. The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, emphasizing the requirement that goods must move across state borders due to a contractual agreement between buyer and seller for sales tax under the Central Sales Tax Act.

Ultimately, the Supreme Court agreed with the High Court's decision, stating that there was no basis for interference given the facts of the case. The application for leave to appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's ruling. The judgment highlighted the importance of proving both the sale of goods and their transport across state borders to establish inter-State sales for tax assessment purposes.

---